ntdll.dll Access Violation

dpgriffith · Post by **dpgriffith** » Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:24 pm

I created a new Generic Serial device for my receiver and created the commands for it.

I added the new device and mapped the commands for the first property which was selection of the input mode, ie vcr1,vcr2 etc. I clicked on the next property to map commands and HB blew up.

I restarted it and tried to get back to the properties of the receiver device but no mater which property I click on except for log it blows up.

I went into the database and removed everything I could find to do with the device and restarted and added it back. Same thing. selecting any property but log blows it up.

The Dump file had this.
====== Begin Dump - Saturday, November 03, 2007 17:08:38 ======
Server Version = 3.01

==================================
======== House Server Thread =======
==================================
Thread Type = Main UI Thread
Thread ID = B38
Exception code: C0000005 ACCESS_VIOLATION
Fault address: 7C911563 01:00010563 C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll

Registers:
EAX:00000008
EBX:000096B1
ECX:00DA0000
EDX:000003DC
ESI:00000000
EDI:08534B90
CS:EIP:001B:7C911563
SS:ESP:0023:0012E2D4 EBP:0012E4F4
DS:0023 ES:0023 FS:003B GS:0000

Call stack:

====== End Dump ======

Anybody got any ideas?

Post by **ScottBot** » Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:20 pm

It definitely sounds like something in the database is messed up. Unfortunately the dump file doesn't have any useful information.

If you want to send me your MDB file, maybe I can reproduce it and fix your DB.

dpgriffith · Post by **dpgriffith** » Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:50 pm

Scott,

I backed up my ddf and hdf files then removed most of the items from both. I then did some database cleanup and then restarted HB. I'm back up and running at this point and have added most things back into the .ddf and .hdf files. It is still working ok at this point. All is back except for some of the items in the the .hdf file. I will be adding some back a little at a time. I wonder if this is something to do with a reserved character maybe?

Post by **ScottBot** » Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:53 pm

dpgriffith wrote:I wonder if this is something to do with a reserved character maybe?

I wouldn't think so... but there's definitely a bug in there somewhere.